
By: Al Humphrey Onyanabo
There appears to be a dramatic twist in the ongoing controversy involving popular cleric Pastor Chris Okafor and Nollywood actress Doris Ogala, as fresh claims from insiders now cast serious doubt on the allegations that recently set social media ablaze.
Sources familiar with internal developments within the pastor’s circle insist that the accusations levelled against Pastor Okafor are entirely false, describing them as a coordinated smear campaign allegedly sponsored by a former pastor who was once close to him. According to the insider, the said former associate is accused of having had an affair with Doris Ogala as well as another prominent female member of the church.
The source further claims that the dramatic allegations, including purported evidence circulating online, are forged and form part of what was described as a desperate attempt to tarnish the image of Pastor Okafor and discredit his ministry.
> “How does someone suddenly wake up months after he has done his marriage introduction to start making these claims?” the insider questioned. “Where has she been all this while?”
Adding another layer to the unfolding drama, the source revealed that a formal petition has reportedly been written, and that Doris Ogala alongside other alleged collaborators may soon be invited for questioning by relevant authorities as investigations progress.
While none of these counter-claims have yet been officially confirmed by law enforcement agencies, they have significantly shifted public attention, raising questions about the timing, motive, and authenticity of the allegations that triggered widespread outrage online.
If the claims of a fabricated relationship and manipulated evidence are eventually proven true, the saga would stand as a troubling example of how social media can be weaponised to destroy reputations, especially in an era where accusations often spread faster than facts.
The unfolding situation underscores the growing dangers of trial by social media, where unverified claims can inflict lasting damage before investigations are concluded. Observers warn that the case serves as a cautionary tale for the public to exercise restraint and critical judgment when consuming and sharing sensitive information online.
As the controversy continues to evolve, all eyes remain on the parties involved, with many calling for a thorough and transparent investigation to separate truth from manipulation and ensure justice for all concerned.


